For more than two decades, Wade Kricken has been a litigator in a variety of cases. With a specialty in real estate law and litigation, he has handled over one thousand cases since opening his own law practice. In this blog post, we will explore the pros of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for litigators and how it can be beneficial to the legal process.
The Pros of ADR
Alternative dispute resolution is a popular method of resolving conflicts outside traditional court proceedings. There are several advantages to using ADR instead of litigation, especially when it comes to complex cases.
Here are just a few:
● Cost-effective – ADR typically costs much less than litigation because it does not involve as many lawyers and court hearings. This makes it an attractive option for those who cannot afford the high costs associated with traditional court proceedings.
● Time-saving – ADR is often faster than litigation, as the process typically involves fewer meetings and no lengthy trial or appeals process. This means that clients can have their disputes resolved quickly and efficiently without having to wait months or even years for the case to be resolved in court.
● Flexible – Unlike traditional courts, ADR offers flexibility in terms of how the dispute is resolved. Parties can negotiate different solutions that may not be available through a court ruling, giving them more control over the outcome of their case.
● Private – ADR proceedings are typically conducted in private settings, which allows both parties to resolve their dispute without fear of public scrutiny or unwanted publicity. This can be especially important for sensitive matters such as divorce or child custody disputes.
● Improved Relationships – When disputes are resolved through ADR, relationships between parties may improve because they have come together to reach an agreement without involving third-party intervention from a judge or jury. This can help foster better relationships between opposing sides and prevent further conflict down the road.
Conclusion:
By understanding the pros associated with this form of dispute resolution, attorneys like Wade Kricken can assist clients in finding appropriate resolutions that benefit all parties involved while avoiding unnecessary expenses and delays associated with traditional courts.
